"It doesn't matter how beautiful your theory is, it doesn't matter how smart you are. If it doesn't agree with experiment, it's wrong." Richard P. Feynman

Wednesday, October 6, 2010

Solar Power Schemes Rip off Poor - Subsidise Rich!

The National Generators Forum has blown the whistle on the true cost of the solar panel rebate and tariff schemes being implemented lemming -like by the Federal and state governments around the country .

SCHEMES that pay households to produce power using rooftop solar panels are costing about 25 times as much to cut greenhouse gases as a nationwide ETS.

The warning comes from electricity generators who say the schemes will lead to soaring energy bills.
In a confidential submission obtained by The Australian, the National Generators Forum has told the NSW government that its scheme is costing between $520 and $640 to reduce each tonne of carbon dioxide - compared with the $23 per tonne proposed in the emissions trading scheme shelved by Kevin Rudd.
The submission states that although the scheme will create green jobs, each job created will cost between $130,000 and $700,000. "The cost of the scheme is borne by all energy customers but hidden," the submission states. "There is a widespread community view that solar generation is good for the environment. However, there is little public understanding of the cost of delivering those perceived benefits."
It is not surprising that the economically illiterate NSW Labor Government has  the most financially irresponsible scheme which pays consumers for the power they generate, not export which means that $600  /MWHr is being paid for power costing $52 on the wholesale market. This cost will be paid by low income families ,unit dwellers and renters who do not have solar panels.
But the solar schemes lead to higher prices because households with solar panels or wind turbines are paid vastly more than power stations on the electricity grid; in NSW for instance, people are paid $600 per megawatt hour for producing power using solar panels, which compares with prices on the wholesale energy market of about $52 per megawatt hour.


Last week, the Greens reintroduced legislation to the Senate that would create a national "feed-in tariff" scheme, under which consumers would be paid to generate power using a wide range of renewable technologies.
The Greens' plan is akin to the NSW Solar Bonus scheme - considered the most generous in Australia and currently being reviewed - in that it would pay consumers the tariff on everything they generated even if they used that power themselves.
The South Australian and Victorian schemes pay consumers only for the energy they export, but the Greens say this is a "particularly weak" approach.
Energy Supply Association of Australia chief executive Brad Page said that under the Greens' proposal consumers would "pay massively more for electricity" than they needed to for at least the next two decades. He added that the proposal was a "regressive form of taxation"; grants were a better way to commercialise nascent technologies.
Another industry source said the Greens' move had led to "primal screams" within the $7 billion-a-year power generation sector over a policy that was "economically ignorant" and would mean that, in Sydney, "Bankstown electricity users pay for Point Piper users".
The federal government's Renewable Energy Target of 20 per cent renewable energy by 2020 issues multiple Renewable Energy Certificates to owners of small-scale solar, wind and hydro-electric systems, which they generally transfer back to their energy supplier in return for a cash payment or cheaper bill. But this has caused the National Generators Forum to question the need for further state-based subsidies for such technologies. The carbon price under the federal scheme, which is not a feed-in tariff, is about $38.50 a tonne.
Mr Page said the schemes represented a "rapidly growing impost on the economy" as the tariffs were not budget-funded but were "smeared across the community".
Energy Users Association of Australia executive director Roman Domanski described the schemes as "middle-class welfare" and said they lacked the compensation big industrial users expected under emissions trading.
The Australian Council of Social Service's senior policy officer of energy and climate change, Tony Westmore, feared "a serious increase" in power bills and said "those people who have the cash to be able to put the panels on their roof will be subsidised by people who can't afford their current bills".
Mr Westmore said the NSW model - known as a "gross" feed-in tariff because it pays people for everything their panel generates - was "likely to prove grossly inequitable".
Other states tended to use "net" schemes that paid people for power that was superfluous to their own needs and went into the grid; these were "possibly inequitable".
"On the one hand, we are supportive of the deployment of renewable energy and the jobs it brings, but it really ought to be done strategically," Mr Westmore said.
The unforgiveable crime to me is the fact that these rebates are mandated far into the future which means a financial burden on our children created by the inept decisions of current governments. It is high time for some sanity!

5 comments:

  1. Feed-in-tariffs are a stealth tax. They are not collected as taxes, not paid out as subsidies, yet they redistribute wealth in the exact same way. Greenies can then claim that there was "no tax increase" to fund their projects.
    In countries where they exist, they have had exactly the effect mentioned: relatively wealthy home owners can make an extra buck with a solar installation, and they don't even use the electricity themselves but buy their own consumption off the grid. Meanwhile poor apartment dwellers have to pay higher and higher bills to fund the whole thing.

    ReplyDelete
  2. The whole feed in tariff incentive scheme may be flawed, but it wouldn't be prudent to throw out the system completely. It only needs several cycles of audits and readjustment to find the optimal point between controlling expense while encouraging growth.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I agree with the Stealth tax thing. It seems that while government is liberally funding solar panel projects, electricity bills are going up and up.

    ReplyDelete
  4. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Most people overestimate the cost of installing a solar energy system. Whether you want to reduce your power bill, protect yourself against rising power increases, or power your electric vehicle with free fuel from the sun, there has never been a better time to consider purchasing a rooftop solar power plant for your home or business.

    solar panels norfolk

    ReplyDelete