However when "settled science" computer models say there is a causational link between carbon dioxide levels and temperature and the real world looks like the C3 graph below you have to ask who are the real "flat-earthers".
Wednesday, August 3, 2011
BBC Science Reviewer on Flat-Earthers
Steve Jones, in a review of BBC Science coverage recommended in effect that sceptics be given even less time (if that were possible) on the BBC which provoked a hail of criticism. Jones in an article in the Telegraph defends himself and attacked sceptics by saying that science upsets "flat-earthers". The comments on his article are mostly not complimentary! An analogy he didn't offer was that of Galileo's science which upset the planets-rotate-around-the-earthers consensus. Of course with climate "flat-earthers" including scientific luminaries like Richard Lindzen and Freeman Dyson this particular sceptic accepts the ad hominem with some pride.
However when "settled science" computer models say there is a causational link between carbon dioxide levels and temperature and the real world looks like the C3 graph below you have to ask who are the real "flat-earthers".
However when "settled science" computer models say there is a causational link between carbon dioxide levels and temperature and the real world looks like the C3 graph below you have to ask who are the real "flat-earthers".
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment