"It doesn't matter how beautiful your theory is, it doesn't matter how smart you are. If it doesn't agree with experiment, it's wrong." Richard P. Feynman

Thursday, September 15, 2011

Nobel Laureate joins world's top physicist in Global Warming scepticism!!

Ivar GiaeverA  major blow to the Global Warming religion has been struck by another eminent physicist Dr Ivar Giaevar a Nobel Prize Winner who has resigned in disgust from the APS because of their stance on supporting the Global Warming scam .With his very public rejection of the "science" of global warming Dr Giaever joins another illustrious physicist Freeman Dyson in the sceptic  ranks.

His letter of resignation says it all:
From: Ivar Giaever [ mailto:giaever@XXXX.com]

Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2011 3:42 PM
To: kirby@xxx.xxx
Cc: Robert H. Austin; ‘William Happer’; ‘Larry Gould’; ‘S. Fred Singer’; Roger Cohen
Subject: I resign from APS
Dear Ms. Kirby
Thank you for your letter inquiring about my membership. I did not renew it because I can not live with the statement below:
Emissions of greenhouse gases from human activities are changing the atmosphere in ways that affect the Earth’s climate. Greenhouse gases include carbon dioxide as well as methane, nitrous oxide and other gases. They are emitted from fossil fuel combustion and a range of industrial and agricultural processes.
The evidence is incontrovertible: Global warming is occurring.
If no mitigating actions are taken, significant disruptions in the Earth’s physical and ecological systems, social systems, security and human health are likely to occur. We must reduce emissions of greenhouse gases beginning now.
In the APS it is ok to discuss whether the mass of the proton changes over time and how a multi-universe behaves, but the evidence of global warming is incontrovertible? The claim (how can you measure the average temperature of the whole earth for a wholeyear?) is that the temperature has changed from ~288.0 to ~288.8 degree Kelvin in about 150 years, which (if true) means to me is that the temperature has been amazingly stable, and both human health and happiness have definitely improved in this ‘warming’ period.
Best regards,
Ivar Giaever
Nobel Laureate 1973
PS. I included a copy to a few people in case they feel like using the information.
Ivar Giaever
XXX XXX
XXX
USA
Phone XXX XXX XXX
Fax XXX XXX XXX


Freeman Dyson who has been called the natural successor to Einstein and arguably one of the finest minds of the last hundred years is a global warming sceptic . If he had been included in the bodgie survey on climate scientists the other 97% would not matter.



My first heresy says that all the fuss about global warming is grossly exaggerated. Here I am opposing the holy brotherhood of climate model experts and the crowd of deluded citizens who believe the numbers predicted by the computer models. Of course, they say, I have no degree in meteorology and I am therefore not qualified to speak. But I have studied the climate models and I know what they can do. The models solve the equations of fluid dynamics, and they do a very good job of describing the fluid motions of the atmosphere and the oceans. They do a very poor job of describing the clouds, the dust, the chemistry and the biology of fields and farms and forests. They do not begin to describe the real world that we live in. The real world is muddy and messy and full of things that we do not yet understand. It is much easier for a scientist to sit in an air-conditioned building and run computer models, than to put on winter clothes and measure what is really happening outside in the swamps and the clouds. That is why the climate model experts end up believing their own models.


Rick Perry the Republican presidential candidate is in pretty august company with his sceptical views on global warming alarmism.

1 comment:

  1. Baron, you need my real proofs / facts /formulas, to make an impact. Plimer's antics are known by the Warmist; doesn't worry them; because are concocted by the Warmist club. They all bark up the same wrong tree. I know both people that proofread his book. Twin brother of one of them paid for publishing my book. The other, I inserted his comment in the condensed version of my book; it's in PDF form on the homepage. All they have is childish, opposite than any real proofs. If you read what is on my blog - will be like turning the lights on.

    only real proofs can stop Julia, I have those. Everything is proven now. His phony GLOBAL warmings from the past, will not prove that is no global warming in 100y. Part of the planet can get warmer - by the laws of physics - other part must get colder simultaneously; real proofs http://globalwarmingdenier.wordpress.com So-far, Warmist are wining with lies; Skeptics, instead of presenting REAL proofs; they keep ridiculing the Warmist; on the street is interpreted as what they say in my old country: only behind a good horse is a lot of dust. Help me to get the real profs to the public. You will see the difference. Real proofs are easy to recognise. Cannot argue against the laws of physics. The phony GLOBAL warming and constant climatic changes are not related; that's where Plimer is gone wrong

    ReplyDelete